Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Radu Mihai Papoe vs Connor Bruce Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Papoe vs Bruce analysis and find out who is favored!
Radu Mihai Papoe vs Connor Bruce Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Papoe 1 - 0 Bruce
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Papoe has won 61.43% of points on their second serve, while Bruce has won 59.09%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Papoe, in recent form, has won 57.58% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bruce has won 66.67%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.76% and 32.08% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Papoe has saved 62.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bruce has saved 20% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Papoe has won 77.14% of matches played (W/L 27/ 8), with Bruce winning 60% (W/L 9/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Papoe has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 23/ 9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 66/ 34). Bruce has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Papoe has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 78.79% of matches (W/L 26/ 7), where as Bruce has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 9/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Papoe winning 1 times and Bruce being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Papoe winning 2 and Bruce winning 1. The last match between Papoe and Bruce was at the M25 Columbus, 15-11-2023, First, I.hard with Radu Mihai Papoe getting the victory 6-7(3) 6-0 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:19:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Papoe and Bruce have played a deciding set 1 times, with Papoe winning 1 times and Bruce 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Papoe winning 0, and Bruce 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Papoe has played against opponents with an average rank of 193.23 while Bruce has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Papoe has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bruce has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Papoe has converted 61.9% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bruce has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
551
Rank
509
High
21
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
68% (94-45)
Career Total W/L
47% (9-10)
75% (3-1)
YTD W/L
50% (1-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Radu Mihai Papoe | Connor Bruce |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:19:0 | 2:19:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (59/92) | 55% (52/94) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (37/59) | 48% (25/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (19/33) | 40% (17/42) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (8/22) | 33% (3/9) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (52/94) | 39% (36/92) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(3) 6-0 6-1 |
Stats 
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Connor Bruce
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
52 of
94)
108
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Radu Mihai Papoe | Connor Bruce |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 75% (3/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 60% (3/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 59% (46/32) | 57% (27/20) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 8 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.04 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:30 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (169/239) | 66% (43/65) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (115/169) | 56% (24/43) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 61% (43/70) | 59% (13/22) |
| BPs Won% Total | 62% (13/21) | 50% (4/8) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (104/247) | 42% (31/74) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Radu Mihai Papoe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Radu Mihai Papoe
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
11
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Ozan Baris
70%
(
73 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
99
|
1-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Henrik Wiersholm
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
2
Aces
4
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Radu Mihai Papoe
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Preston Stearns
46%
(
18 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Connor Bruce
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
52 of
94)
108
Total Points Won
78
|
6-7(3) 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Liam Draxl
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Perry Gregg
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
74%
(
56 of
76)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Angel Diaz Jalil
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Connor Bruce Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gabrielius Guzauskas
Player
Connor Bruce
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 7-5 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Connor Bruce
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
52 of
94)
108
Total Points Won
78
|
6-7(3) 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Connor Bruce
Player
Eric Perkowski
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 1-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kareem Allaf
Player
Connor Bruce
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 3-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Papoe Vs Bruce Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
